« January 2006 | Main | March 2006 »

February 28, 2006

Ignore the Greatest Hits

I just spent some time this afternoon looking at the Amazon music blowout. There is enough good stuff there just in the $7.99 sections, so I thought I'd point out a few classics. There are a ton of greatest hits albums there too, but if you are a true music lover, you will pretend like they don't exist. Move along. Nothing to see there.

FYI, I've stopped my Amazon Affiliate experiment, so I won't get a piece of any sales. (In case you have some aversion to making me money, rest assured).

To the music:

- Miles Davis Kind of Blue. If you own one jazz album, this should be it.

- The Clash London Calling. Their best. I love "Lost in the Supermarket". Get this even if you always embarass yourself by confusing these guys with The Ramones (as I do).

- Johnny Cash At Folsom Prison. Good times listening to Cash win the prisoners over.

- John Coltrane A Love Supreme. Coltrane's prayer after he got clean and found God. So special they started a Catholic church based on it in San Francisco.

- Jeff Buckley Grace. Lots of aging hipsters love this one. I'm a latecomer, won over by hearing "Hallelujah" on several recent soundtracks.

- Public Enemy It Takes a Nation of Millions to Hold Us Back. I don't have this one. But it's always on top 50 lists, and is pretty seminal for modern hip-hop. Guess I should take my own advice and order it :).

- Spice Girls Spice. I have a big soft spot for the Girls, and this is their best. Seriously. Best. Guilty. Pleasure. Ever.

- Miles Davis Quintet Relaxin'. This quintet was the best (Coltrane and Miles!), and if you like it straight-ahead, this is about as good as it gets.

- Chris LeDoux Western Underground. The pinnacle of modern countr... er, who am I kidding. LeDon't buy this one.

That was terrible. I'm sorry. I just had to LeWork that in there.

February 23, 2006

February 23rd

Image021.jpg

Any possible reason why St. Patrick's day cookies should be for sale today, 3+ weeks before green mashed potatoes make it to my dinner table?

February 22, 2006

Hey Hey Hey, it's been a year!

Dearest real-keepers,

One year ago today, I began my journey here by putting up a couple of posts -- marking the beginning of this here website. I imagine even fewer new blogs make it thru one year than new restaurants, so I've got that going for me, which is nice. Anniversaries mean reflection, and reflection means... you guessed it, blogging about blogging!

Some quick stats on the site:

- 125 entries
- 138 comments (most to tell me I spelled something wrong)
- ~50 billion comment spams (deleted by hand)
- I'd add some traffic data, but it looks like my hosting company's SSL certificate died today. So I can't get that info. A cynic would tell you that's because only 3 1/2 people visit the site every day. Hi Mom!

Yesterday, my buddy Aaron's post on quality vs. quantity got me thinking... but rather than do the right thing and figure out how to make a trackback to his post, I'll just hijack his discussion for my own purposes.

I tend to favor quality over quantity for single-author blogs. One person's voice can get to be a bit overwhelming on a daily basis, and I don't have room in my.yahoo for an RSS feed of all the single-author blogs I read. I have a couple of topical (read: sports) blogs with multiple authors that I throw on there, but the content (and commenting community) is good enough that it's actually useful to lead me to the post or two that goes up there every day. I like to visit the rest of the single-author blogs I read randomly -- whenever I think about it.

Besides, I just don't have the energy or inspiration to write interesting stuff regularly. There have been times (such as recently) where I've forced myself to write mediocre stuff or post pictures just to keep up with my idea of low-bar regularity. But posting once or twice a week with interesting stuff is *way* better than posting daily in a journal style (I had waffles for breakfast... etc.), IMHO.

So... the ideal option is to bring another author onto this site, or have regular guest posts by people I know who are keeping it real. I've flirted with both ideas, but every time someone sounds interested, nothing comes of it. If you have funny ideas and would like to join me in keeping it real, lemme know.

Now for the sentimental ending: Coincidentally (to the blog), the past year has stretched me and helped me grow in ways I couldn't have imagined. Hopefully some of that came thru on this site in entertaining ways. Needless to say, watching Sam be born and start growing up has changed me a bit :). Nothing helps you keep it real more than a baby pushing your nipple like it's a button on a remote control at 3AM. And Becky and Sam are the best family I could dream of. I'm *sure* that came thru on the site.

February 19, 2006

Olympic Notes

I know I've been writing about sports a lot lately, but what the heck. Since I'm still not ready to talk about the Super Bowl outcome, how about some Olympic fever?

- Does it strike anyone else as wierd that the English word for Torino was Turin for thousands of years, but NBC thought Torino sounded better so... It's Torino! Hey kids, let's go see the shroud of Torino!

- Here in the 206, we get CBC on cable, so we've been watching a lot more Canadian coverage of the games. Despite NBC's claims of 24.6 hours a day of coverage on their networks, the good stuff is broadcast all day long on CBC. Bonus: no more annoying American jingoism, instead we get the Canadian flavor!

- Speaking of, CBC broadcasts lots more of the 'real' sports -- Nordic Skiing, Speed Skating, and, well -- I guess that's all the 'real' Winter Olympic sports I can think of.

- Another good segue. Every night there is a new event that is less and less like a sport. I tolerated Moguls Skiing and Skeleton, but Ice Dancing is too much. Is there anything sporting about this? This event is the worst move by the IOC since the fated Summer Olympics Bridge experiment.

- Curling, however, is my true Olympic love. It turns out that the best curling club in North America is in Seattle. My dreams of Olympic glory are renewed! The path to Whistler 2010 starts for Mrs. Ikeepitreal and me with the Sunday evening mixed league next fall!

February 16, 2006

Winter Passing

I just read a review of "Winter Passing" today. Looks like it's got a recipe for success:

- A dark comedy about a city girl coming home to her kooky family in the Upper Penninsula of Michigan (quick shout out to my UP homies!)

- Ed Harris as the novelist ex-hippie dad with crazy long blond hair

- Will Ferrell as a Christian rocker(!)

- "That girl" from Elf and Hitchikers Guide as the female lead (romanced again by Ferrell?)

Check out the trailer

February 05, 2006

Defensive Comparison

The other day I gave you my laymen's perspective on how the offenses compare. Now for the defenses. Again, I will start with the coaching because I think it's pertinent:

Defensive Coaches: Pittsburgh

Dick LeBeau is a defensive wizard. He brought the 3-4 back, constantly runs creative zone blitzes, and confuses the hell out of offensive linemen. The only downside is that he's about 70 years old. Someone make this man a head coach already. LeBeau clearly gets the edge here over John Marshall, who did a great job filling in for Ray Rhodes this year, and always seems to make the right defensive call.

Defensive Line: Push

Despite my even ranking, this is a real contrast in styles. In the 3-4 defense used by Pittsburgh, the lineman are supposed to 'eat up' blocks, allowing LBs to get in and make tackles/pressure the QB. In a 4-3 like Seattle runs, the goal is to create that pressure with the linemen. The Hawks did that extremely well this year, leading the league in sacks. They rotate lots of smallish linemen thru, with the standouts being 'Admiral' Bryce Fisher and Rocky Bernard (Grant 'Adonis' Wistrom gets all the love, despite being almost completely washed up). In contrast, Pittsburgh uses just a handful of DLs, with several of them being Pro Bowl worthy. Former BSU Bronco Kimo von Olehoffen and nose tackle Casey Hampton are the best of the bunch. These are the guys who don't get a lot of stats, but constantly absorb 2 OL blocks.

Linebackers: Pittsburgh

This is the real strength of the Steelers, scheme wise and talent wise. The scheme helps them succeed, but the fact that they have 3 absolute stud LBs doesn't hurt. James Farrior, Larry Foote, and motor-mouth Joey Porter are all great NFL players, and I'd be hard pressed to find a better group in the NFL. If Seattle's OL is their best-in-the-NFL-type-strength, the LBs of Pittsburgh is that unit for the Steelers. Meanwhile, the Seahawks run out 2 great rookie linebackers, including my favorite Hawk Lofa Tatupu. They are good, but can't match up to the Steel Curtain here.

Cornerbacks: Seattle

This is a weakness for both teams. The Seahawks are finally healthy at CB, getting offseason signings Andre Dyson and Kelly Herndon back for the playoffs. They did a great job against Santana Moss and Steve Smith in the 2 playoff games, but will have their hands full with Hines Ward and co. #1 corner Marcus Trufant better come ready to play. On the other side, Ike Taylor and DeShea Townsend can be beaten deep, assuming you have the time to throw the ball. I give the edge to the Hawks in a lean.

Safties: Pittsburgh

What did you expect. This is all Troy Polamalu. Polamalu, Polamalu, Polamalu. Have you heard his name enough yet? No? Polamalu. This just in - he is good! And he hasn't cut his hair since college! And the officials took an INT away from him against Indy! Polamalu. The Seahawks have converted linebacker and underrated safety Michael Bolware and a couple of backups who have done well. But they can't match up to the genius that is Polamalu. I think he just rescued a baby trapped under a bus! Polamalu!

Special Teams: Push

Not much to say here. The Steelers are good in the return game, the Seahawks are good in the kicking game. Woo. Let's call it a push and move on, but if Josh Brown wins the game in the closing seconds, I will feel free to revisit this and write how much I love the Seahawks special teams.

That is all for the XL position breakdown. It splits out to this:

Offense -- 2-2-2
Defense/Special Teams -- 3-1-2 Steelers

Wow. I gave Pittsburgh the edge. Good thing the defenses don't match up against each other. I'll stand by my boys and predict a 33-24 win by the Seahawks today. Gooooo team!